Charles Schwab · July 2026

2026 RIA Benchmarking Study

Charles Schwab's 2026 RIA Benchmarking Study (July 2026; n=1,236, fielded Jan–Mar 2026) found that 31% vs 19% Top Performing Firms vs. all others using AI to automate time-consuming, manual workflows.

Read the original report ↗Cite2 min read · Summary updated
Top Performing Firms are more likely to use AI to automate manual workflowsPercent of firms using AI to automate time-consuming, manual workflows, 2026
Top Performing Firms (top 20% of index)
31%
All other firms
19%
Source: Charles Schwab, 2026 RIA Benchmarking Study, 2026.

Key findings

  1. 01
    Top Performing Firms use AI to automate time-consuming, manual workflows 31% of the time versus 19% for other firms.
  2. 02
    Among firms with $250 million or more in assets under management, AI usage reached 83%, led by administrative tasks (65%) and client correspondence (49%).
  3. 03
    47% of firms use AI to draft job descriptions; 35% use it to formulate interview questions.

By the numbers

31% vs 19%Top Performing Firms vs. all others using AI to automate time-consuming, manual workflows
83%of firms with $250M+ AUM report using some form of AI
47%of firms with $250M+ AUM chose AI strategy as a top area where they want outside help
About one-third of firms have taken leadership steps to support AI adoptionPercent of firms with $250M+ AUM taking each action on AI adoption, 2026
Communicated an AI vision
34%
Senior leaders modeled AI usage
33%
Identified AI champions
33%
Provided AI training
28%
Authorized AI training
24%
Developed AI prompt libraries
9%
Avoided the need to hire new staff
9%
Changed staff's job responsibilities
6%
Source: Charles Schwab, 2026 RIA Benchmarking Study, 2026, Slide 33.

What it means for you Draft

For executives at $10–100M companies

Advisory firms look a lot like other small professional services businesses: almost everyone uses AI for admin, but top performers are more likely to automate whole workflows. For a $10–100M firm, the gap between 'drafting emails' and 'redesigning a process' seems to be where the difference shows up.

Limitations

Medium trust.Large, long-running benchmark; sample limited to Schwab-custodied RIAs; Schwab is a custodian, not an AI vendor.

The headline figure measures the “In core work” stage of adoption (running in key processes).Why adoption numbers disagree

Cite the original

Charles Schwab. "2026 RIA Benchmarking Study." July 2026. https://advisorservices.schwab.com/insights-hub/perspectives/ria-benchmarking-study-2026